That’s exactly how it would be done……..
It would be done in sly round about way……….
Inscriptions spam was introduced inadvertently and now it is held up high as freedom tech…….
They think we forgot…….
Let’s do a quick thought experiment. Imagine a government wants to attack Bitcoin. What could they do?
They can compromised a number of developers. The developers could start slowly degrading Bitcoin.
They could change the definition of Bitcoin being "digital currency that uses peer-to-peer technology" to just be a "peer-to-peer network".
They could change the definition of the datacarriersize.
Using that as argument they could deny fixing the inscriptions spam.
Then they could use the inscriptions spam as an argument that spam is unstoppable so they better blow up OP_RETURN and invite even more spam.
Just like BSV did after which someone uploaded CSAM to the BSV blockchain.
nostr:nevent1qqs0tqm8l2tqz7yvcjqr42tu34z450xr9t6zgq7pcjtqfswp28grn3gdj9z9r



That’s exactly how it would be done……..
It would be done in sly round about way……….
Inscriptions spam was introduced inadvertently and now it is held up high as freedom tech…….
They think we forgot…….