Is bitcoin better money because of those properties? Sure.

Are those properties a requirement for money? No. History is full of moneys that didn't offer much but were still highly used.

Is a global unified ledger a requirement? No, you can have sharded ledgers everywhere. They can all be different from one another. Does it exist today? No. Could it exist? For sure. Do we know how to build it? No.

Just because things are the way they are doesn't mean that better things cannot exist. I don't know if we will see something better than Bitcoin in my lifetime, but there is no mathematical proof that a better system can't exist.

Let's give it another 100 years and check in later. My bet is that Bitcoin will last as long as other global reserve currencies have lasted. Then somebody will have a true new idea.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you don't get bitcoin either

Lovin' this thread.

vitor outed himself as a shitcoiner, so idk, that's fun i guess

doesn't understand the moneyness of a global ledger versus a corporate, limited scope ledger, which is an equity or security, not a real thing in itself

Oh noes nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z you better hand over your bitcoin membership card now. 😂

Imagine when he realizes that I created a coin called Karrot to represent vision exams in a circular vision insurance marketplace between employees, employers and vision doctors. 😅

Those kinds of things in small closed circles have a chance of representing some sort of reality. They're more like food stamps.

With a Karrot ledger here and a Foobarbaz ledger there etc. we're approaching the sharded ledger goal.

Of course people like nostr:npub1fjqqy4a93z5zsjwsfxqhc2764kvykfdyttvldkkkdera8dr78vhsmmleku are so desperate and depraved only wet dreams of some sort of global dominance the kind of James Bond Villains will keep them afloat. That's why anything less has to be rejected.