everyone seems to fawn over RFK but he has spent quite a bit of his life trying to close the indian point nuclear power plant

RFK is not your friend but at least he seems to be anti-war

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Fuck him. He can lick a dick.

Why has he tried to close it?

RFK is a climate catastrophist…

he is very much in the camp of an "environmental nurturer" and it is indeed excellent to prevent pollutants but zero impact is unfortunately impossible and nation grid for high DV voltage wind distributions from north dakota (which he loves) is a non starter

That’s why it is very good for Bitcoin that someone like that is lauding it, kinda dumps all over the climate argument.

simple yet an alt meaning for the above: "nucular" family mechanisms which rewrite personal narratives of family members in order to tightly control image often attempt to destroy family members who function outside their desired family mantras. wealth compounds this, and the extremes to which people will go to silence someone also compounds. depending on the family, they will hunt people into the ground - until they're literally dead. psychological terrorism, relationship plants, physical harm. "accidents" like car crashes or being hit by cars are always used because the repetitive cycles of the same "accidents" within these types of groups in order to numb awareness of actual danger: if you are used to hearing about it (like traine crashes) you stop paying attention because it becomes a new rhetorical norm. my guess would be rfk is in extreme danger so he's making himself extra publicly visible by running for president. just a guess.

He asserted on the All In podcast that it leaks tritium

Check out latest all in podcast. It's 2 hour interview with rfk. A lot of good info. And within interview he talks about that nuclear plant. After the interview the team gives their take, including more about that plant.

It’s a good listen. He seems open to differing viewpoints, which is lacking in other announced candidates…and he is pro-peace.

test ignore

Ok

why? i love jack - we need more jack. not less jack. i get mopey when there's less jack.

None of them are your friend

Dude is spot on. Nuclear power is centralized, dangerous, expensive and unnecessary. If it made financial sense the free market would build them. Nuclear power is dependent on government subsidies more so then oil, gas and renewables combined.

Happy to discuss further in a nest.

If you want to exercise your right to vote (I know many don't), he may be the least bad option. Everyone is flawed in some way.