Replying to Avatar Dissident Sound

. nostr:npub1494rtg3ygq4cqawymgs0q3mcj6hucvu4kmadv03s5ey2sg32df5shtzmp0 says i can't be allowed near voters because i will scare them off.

newsflash: voting has never accomplished anything.

everything that was ever accomplished was either through buying politicians or assassinating them.

Define "accomplished". Voting has achieved many things, but only when the change was understood and supported by an armed populace able and willing to organise in non-systemic ways, and had the sympathy of an elite faction.

Diss, your persona is an obstacle to both one and the other :D You're entertaining, though.

Assassinating politicians is mostly useless in a bureaucratic society.

And buying politicians is easy, but keeping them bought is hard. Blackmail is good, but credible, persistent and organised threats are better.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

whatever - they need to be afraid - and by afraid i don't mean of losing elections.

how you make them afraid is up to you.

Arguably the blackmail networks run by the transnational intelligence apparatus since the postwar period have been pretty good as a "credible, persistent and organized threat" that keeps politicians and other influential or powerful individuals in line. Judging from the connections of people like Epstein and Maxwell (only the most recent and publicized example of this kind of operation) had, not only Israel's spies but those of several other foreign governments were involved in keeping US politicians under their thumb - the UK, France, Germany at a minimum.

True enough, but IDK if I'd characterise the relationship as "run by Intelligence". Intelligence is more like an interface; between the collusive elite networks and the bureaucracy - between those who decide and those who plan.

I had an army buddy who moved to ASIS, our cringey excuse for a foreign Intelligence service. He was very low level, of course, but his work was mostly comparable to an investigative journalist's, with a bit of social research and a bit of lobbying. The aim was to avoid surprises for our bureaucratic planners, and to facilitate covert contacts between our elites and foreign elites.

I think the Epstein-level and above stuff is often, or even mostly, above Intelligence's paygrade, except so far as membership overlaps with that of elite cliques. Elite cliques were doing these games long before Intelligence bureaucrats were invented. Louis the Pious didn't grant the Jewish community tax exemptions out of the goodness of his heart...

That's a fair point except what I'm saying is that the upper echelons of intel substantially overlap with the elite networks. For example, we can see how George H.W. Bush was an example of this - wealthy oil dynasty, politician and former director of the CIA. And all the presidents since then have had pretty spooky backgrounds, the more you look into it; Obama and the Clintons for sure, and Trump not excepted. The broader intelligence community goes all the way down to journalists who dox and harass normies, but that's not who I was talking about.

100%

It's almost as if he thinks they are running things... 😂

What? The dickhead out in the spotlight with the target on them? 😂

Yeah... that's not how it works...

"Assets" are expendable... Let me know when he figures out who isn't... 😂