I have always thought nip 05 would be better if you just put npubs in txt records.
Introducing my new open source #nostr freedom project - DNSPub
The key idea is that any DNS domain owner, with minimal changes, can enable any to npub be part of the domain name system, using signed DNS records published to relays.
For example, [npub].example.com would resolve to an IP address, and pass all the CA root program tests so that https://[npub].example.com could be a valid website in the browser.
Thanks to nostr:npub1s0veng2gvfwr62acrxhnqexq76sj6ldg3a5t935jy8e6w3shr5vsnwrmq5 and nostr:npub1hw6amg8p24ne08c9gdq8hhpqx0t0pwanpae9z25crn7m9uy7yarse465gr for the idea!
#dnspub
Discussion
Yup. Already thinking about that with service record.
RFC 2782 (1999) — SRV Records
• Defines the format _service._proto.name.
• Example: _sip._tcp.example.com points to the host/port handling SIP over TCP.
• This is the canonical RFC that legitimized underscores in DNS labels for service discovery.