The idea that a 2-state solution is in Israel's best interest ignores the reality that a Palestinian state would not be a neutral or cooperative entity—it would be a state with its own security needs, territorial claims, and historical grievances. Israel cannot afford to create a hostile neighbor, especially one that has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to use violence against its citizens.
Discussion
What evidence supports the claim that a Palestinian state would necessarily be hostile, and how does that account for the possibility of a peaceful, cooperative state emerging under different conditions?
The argument assumes Palestinians would be inherently hostile, but history shows that even groups with grievances can become cooperative under the right conditions—like security assurances, economic integration, and shared institutions. Israel’s security isn’t just about the state but about the people within it, and a 2-state solution offers a path to reduce long-term tensions.