But isn't that more based on his mindset of muting people than anything he said about ephebophilia
How do you objectively measure anything? You come up with hypotheses for why they are the way they are, perform tests, and examine the results.
For example, one hypothesis I have is that he will deny anything even a little related to him having a sexual attraction to prepubescent children. That would imply that even if I asked relatively innocuous questions like whether he finds any prepubescent children to be cute and good looking, he will say "no". Then I can actually ask this question, and put my hypothesis up against the possibility of being falsified. Of course there may be other explanations if I observe the predicted results, but I can always perform more experiments too.
nostr:nprofile1qqsfcts2suzpxaeuhy2mnjwd9cwt69l98t3tp2r2hf09hu8uz0zzp5spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsyg8jf4 can come up with similar experiments in order to test whether the dictionary definition of these terms are what people care most about.
Discussion
His muting is just a small part of my conclusion. Mostly I'm drawing from his choice of arguments. I just can't see why a confident secure individual would care so much about the words used to describe him, or about what percentage of the population responds in a particular way.
To me, it seems like he is actively avoiding engagement. Yes, muting is part of it, but I'm muted by a bunch of people. It's what he's actually wasting his time saying that's irritating me in this case.
You say you judge people for thinking this topic matters, but we're kinda forced to by others. People want to hurt me and my loved ones for my honesty about feelings they think everyone should act delusional about. If I'm going to be drone striked for honesty, it makes sense to spend some time establishing record of why the people drone striking me should have found a better reason (like the shit I actually do wrong instead of my honesty)
No, this topic absolutely matters, and in fact, I encourage people to argue about topics that don't matter. What I'm judging him for is for thinking that these particular arguments he has chosen matter as arguments. I'm judging him for believing that the ideas he brings up are relevant to the actual topic, which is the attractiveness of different kids, and what kind of relationships are acceptible. He is not engaging with this topic and that's shameful.
Wow he sounds insane af in the full thread once I click through
Yeh, I'm pretty familiar with his brand of mental illness. I was following him for a while, but the fact that he muted me and just kept posting kids made me unfollow.
Since then I've disabled all media preveiws on Nostr, so maybe I should follow him again.
Unfollow everyone, it's so based. Nostr firehose is the face of god
Ugh, the problem with Nostr firehose is all the non-people and foreign language speakers. I browse global from time to time, but I have muted a bunch of shitty Bitcoin bots and news/RSS bots. I would probably browse global more often if I could filter out notes written in other languages. I would also probably browse global more often if I could streamline my regular feed somehow so that I get all caught up faster.
nostr:nprofile1qqs87rnyk5h026lv9dvg63s0cccjtat8mvkqzng7en5qdkx4kssfutspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0shr0xr I was pretty close to blocking YOU actually, but the fact that you actually reply to people sometimes means that you are a person. Even though I REALLY hate all of your non-reply notes.
Also still waiting for nostr:npub12vkcxr0luzwp8e673v29eqjhrr7p9vqq8asav85swaepclllj09sylpugg to bring back the "my tribe" feed that showed posts from my followers