Doesn’t he describe bitcoin as peaceful though?
Pretty sure he’s advocating for governments to turn to bitcoin for a peaceful, non violent future
His argument —
Please Login to reply.
His argument is rather that one of the aspects of Bitcoin is that it is a shield for property as well as property. Why is that controversial?
I haven’t finished reading it yet but it seems like he is advocating for the world to transition to a peaceful hash war where bloodshed will be a thing of the past
I’d rather have governments fight for hash then kill innocent civilians