You’ve been hinting at some theory about a new way to look at Bitcoin for a while but I haven’t seen anything I can sink my teeth into yet. Makes it feel inauthentic. I’m not smart enough to decode what you’re suggesting but if there is a real seed there I’d encourage you to find a simple way to explain it so it can move the project forward. Otherwise it just feels like you’re telling Bitcoiner’s that you’re smarter than us but you won’t tell us why.
Bitcoin: THE quantum-classical computer already has 180M qubits with zero decoherence
in its 16 years of existence. It appears Microsoft’s last announcement was another dud. I’m oh so shocked. Bitcoin is still the only working quantum
computer for the last 16 years. Surely physics has nothing to say about consensus.
Why can’t bitcoiners see the inherent flaw of centralization in quantum computing? Bitcoin is the language to understand Quantum Mechanics, it’s not the other way around. How do you actually think “nature” maintains the conservation of energy in its transactional nature; surely not a peer to peer energy “cash” system. It’s so obvious. It’s in the literal name “Bit” (0 or 1; qualia) Coin” (stamping of value; quanta). Actually the perfect blend of qualia and quanta; measured in discrete blocks of time. Explain how a UTXO is not the perfect explanation and behavior of what we observe as a quantum bit.
Centralized Quantum Computing is all fake complexity and black box calculations for what bitcoin has already made simple and transparent. Quantum computing is about “hand wavey” as the federal reserve centrally planning the economy. Wake up. We’ve all been wrong about Bitcoin.
https://youtu.be/bJTsFZtD7xE?si=V9PIiRC0NGElC7Xu
Discussion
I hear you. I’m hesitant for a few reasons, one being the battle of releasing this under my name; I don’t want the fame or the attention, but no one will be able to defend it. Yet clearly not one else has gotten here and I feel the stagnation growing.
Secondly before I can get to any math such as redefining temperature, Boltzmann and energy of bitcoin you must be able to use bitcoin as both a thought experiment and a system to observe a “new early universe (in cyberspace)”. Without fundamentally observing the natural evolution of Bitcoin I can’t convince anyone to change their perspective. Bitcoin shows us the way.
How am I supposed to tell people in academia that their entire perspective about a few fundamental things is wrong and Bitcoin is the way to correct it? People think it’s just money lol, and I’m saying it fixes physics. I sound crazy.
I have 2 separate bodies of work, one being 60+ pages long and the other 15. I’ve been thinking about how to join them and condense everything down to be digestible. I have a few ideas.
Do you have any recommendations as to how I could get a physicists to think about the universe through bitcoin so we can fix the perspective on temperature? This is the fundamental breakdown when it comes to quantum mechanics and universal genesis because of “quantum gravity” at what they believe is Planck temperature. But that perspective is wrong, there are no paradoxes. We have everything right; we just have the wrong perspective and have been missing the bitcoin lens in order to see that.
I’m not a scientist but generally I understand that when there is a paradigm shifting hypothesis you form experiments to prove or disprove them. If this new idea is as earth shattering as you say then I would think it would open up new experimental territory and the results would speak for themselves.
As far as remaining anon follow Satoshis example if you want, but I’d encourage you to step into this. If this is what you’re meant to bring into the world own that. We all have a hero’s journey to walk. Yours sounds cool.
Thank you for the perspective. I just fear the world is not ready for Bitcoin quite yet; thus they are certainly not ready for physics and our knowledge to change.
But that’s fundamentally what an idea whose time has come represents. Broad consensus of reality rugged by a more fundamental truth regardless of choice, especially when said idea defines reality. The map is the territory.
Fuck it we ball. I’ll call it a PIP; Physics Improvement Proposal.