#Bitcoin fixes this

The Roosevelts’ web of wealth and power in New York’s elite circles is wild. Isaac Roosevelt co-founded the Bank of New York with Alexander Hamilton in 1784, tying him to the Schuylers (think Philip’s daughter, Elizabeth, married to Hamilton). Roosevelt's and Schuyler's Federalist and mercantile worlds collided at clubs and in intricate connections with aristocrats and European royalty including long time mutual business partners, friendships and marriages.

Philip Schuyler was a powerhouse in Revolutionary America, wielding immense wealth and influence as a major New York landowner from a prominent Dutch family.

Schuyler, a wealthy Dutch-American landowner, and Hamilton, his ambitious son-in-law, were steeped in New York’s pre-Revolutionary mercantile world, which was deeply tied to British trade.

Schuyler’s family, with their vast estates and trade in goods like furs and sugar, relied on British markets and merchants before the war. There connections only became strong as Schuyler's family grew in wealth and power post war.

This wasn’t unique—most colonial elites did business with the British (not all those living in America were supporters of independence or the revolution).

Schuyler’s aristocratic lifestyle and Federalist ideals, deep connections to Europe's royalty and his consistent pro-British stance was appalling to Americans in favor of independence like Horatio Gates.

His role as a general in the Revolution, especially the Fort Ticonderoga loss in 1777, fueled whispers of incompetence or worse, sabotage and outright loyalty to Britain.

Horatio Gates’ faction pointed to his divided loyalties, Schuyler’s elite status and pre-war British ties. The Americans removed Schuyler before the pivotal battle at Saratoga.

Schuyler's ties to Britain—through trade networks and social circles—display his comfort with and support for British systems, even if he fought against them (see Benedict Arnold).

Hamilton’s support for the British was even stronger. Before the war, he worked for a trading firm in St. Croix with British connections and later championed Federalist policies that was called pro-British by passionate critics like Jefferson.

His push for a strong central government, modeled partly on British institutions, and his admiration for their banking system (think the Bank of New York he co-founded with Schuyler’s ally Isaac Roosevelt in 1784) raised eyebrows.

Hamilton’s marriage to Schuyler’s daughter Elizabeth in 1780 tied him to a family whose wealth came from pre-war British trade networks.

His post-war trade policies, favoring British commerce, sparked outrage from Anti-Federalists for favoring Britain, with claims he was obviously influenced by old British loyalties.

Even though they claimed to be patriots, their elite status and transatlantic business ties made it easy to see their british loyalties.

The Roosevelts, Schuylers, and other Dutch-American families had decades of trade with British merchants, and those relationships didn’t vanish overnight when the Revolution began.

Americans wary of aristocrats and those living in America with deep financial ties to European royalty, were well aware of Schuyler’s wealth and Hamilton’s Anglophile ideas showing through their actions. They obviously weren’t fully committed to breaking from Britain and even favored systems to perpetuate Britain's power and influence.

Their private dinners and quiet deals with the British continued. Their world was one where money and power crossed oceans, consistently doing business and intermingling with those directly tied to British and other European royalty. That alone displayed their incentive to perpetuate monarch power.

Then there’s the Astors—Laura Astor wed Franklin Delano (FDR’s uncle) in 1844, merging Roosevelt and Astor fortunes. This wasn’t just love; it was a Dutch-American dynasty play, boosting their real estate and trade clout.

The Astors were powerhouse New York elites, amassing real estate dominance by the early 1800s. John Jacob Astor, a German immigrant invested heavily in Manhattan land, creating a real estate empire that shaped the city.

Their wealth, social ties and influence in banking and politics made them American aristocracy, with transatlantic connections to European elites, rivaling royal clout, deeply affiliated the European crowns and their benefactors abroad.

The Delanos, via FDR’s mom Sara, added shipping wealth. Roosevelts also bankrolled Chemical Bank, rubbing shoulders with proto-Morgan types in railroads and elite clubs like the Union League.

Their strategic marriages to Astors, Livingstons, and Van Rensselaers mirrored European aristocrats consolidating power while deeply connected to royalty. These ties wove a financial and social empire—proof the Roosevelts were American “royalty” in all but name.

The Panic of 1837 exposed how deeply interconnected New York elites, like the Roosevelts and Astors, were with speculative banking tied to British capital.

This financial crisis, triggered by reckless lending and land speculation, hit everyday Americans hard while the elite, including John Jacob Astor, profited by snapping up devalued property.

It showed how their wealth and transatlantic ties shielded them, while regular folks suffered—a pattern some see repeating in modern banking crises. Also, the Second Bank of the United States, which Hamilton’s allies like Schuyler supported, was despised by Andrew Jackson and many Americans for centralizing power in ways that echoed British control, fueling populist distrust of banker elites.

As President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt, whose family grew rich through the Bank of New York, tied to J.P. Morgan’s empire, appointed Charles Bonaparte, Napoleon’s grandnephew to several powerful positions in his administration.

With Napoleon III ruling France until 1870, just years before Charles’s rise, this Harvard-educated insider knew his family’s wealth sat in French and English banks, linked to Morgan’s network.

Charles founded the FBI’s predecessor in 1908. His trust-busting stabilized European royalty and aristocracy connected industries, boosting centralized finance for elites like Morgan—a clear play to entrench transatlantic power.

Among other deep elite ties, Teddy Rosevelt's great grandfather founded the bank of New York with Hamilton.

Teddy's cousin started the chemical bank and his grandfather further built their wealth through that bank. The chemical bank merged with jp morgan.

Morgan had direct ties to royalty/banking elites in europe and their proxies.

This gave J.P. Morgan early access to royal and aristocratic networks, which he leveraged to dominate American finance. These ties made Morgan a linchpin between American industry and European royalty/banking dynasties.

He also used his influence to destabilize the banking system. He caused systemic pressure and chaos leading to the implementation of the federal reserve. Read the creature from Jekyll Island.

The media portrayed Teddy as a trust buster cracking down on banks and big business. His actions strengthened the most powerful and those connected to European royalty.

As mentioned at the top of this note, Theodore Roosevelt appointed a grandson of Napoleon Bonaparte's brother to several powerful positions in his administration, Charles Joseph Bonaparte, who had deep connections to European royalty and banking.

In 1905, Roosevelt appointed Bonaparte as Secretary of the Navy, and in 1906, he appointed him Attorney General.

In 1908 Bonaparte established and played a key role in the Bureau of Investigation, later renamed the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 1924.

In nineteen thirteen, the Federal Reserve was covertly crafted on Jekyll Island, pushed through U.S. government channels by J.P. Morgan, linked to British and European banking elites, and Paul Warburg, tied to German banking dynasties like the Warburgs and Rothschilds.

This secretive deal, driven by elite financiers with deep transatlantic ties, centralized control of America’s money supply, raising troubling concerns about unchecked power and foreign influence in the nation’s economy.

Morgan’s London connections through J.S. Morgan & Company and Warburg’s European banking roots tied to the Federal Reserve’s origins hints at the controversial secrecy and elite control detailed in the book *The Creature from Jekyll Island*.

nostr:nevent1qqste9s5upv7d7pynpqkreglhgzhjxzr2hh66wpkquhl8rt3qcejkwspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhga9zqz5

nostr:nevent1qqsr29rfdhmf29mmscu873zyreu0hxyefwyy8x9u45euuzcz68emkrgpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wclzwdr3

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#Bitcoin fixes this

FDR’s gold confiscation in 1933 wasn’t just a “raw deal”—it was straight-up theft of people’s wealth, forcing them to hand over gold to the Federal Reserve at a fixed price, gutting their financial freedom while the Depression had folks starving. That’s not just policy; it’s a crime against individual rights.

And letting companies like Standard Oil supply fuel to Nazis or IBM tech their logistics? That’s complicity, plain and simple, not some neutral “oversight” while the economy tanked.

FDR’s gold confiscation through Executive Order 6102 in 1933 forced people to turn in their gold coins, bullion, and certificates to the Federal Reserve at a set price, effectively centralizing control over wealth under the guise of stabilizing the economy. It was a power move, no question—stripping individuals of financial independence while funneling gold to the feds.

On the social programs, the New Deal was crumbs to the masses. Leaving suffering, struggling people in praise of a corrupt government for letting them live on a lifeline while the government and those connected ammassed fortunes for themselves while committing and supporting human rights atrocities in America and abroad.

Programs like Social Security and the WPA were sold as relief but also entrenched government control and they didn’t go far enough to fix the Depression’s root issues—unemployment hit 25% at its peak, and recovery was shaky.

The banking ties are real; some U.S. firms, like those linked to Standard Oil or Prescott Bush’s Union Banking Corporation, did business with Nazi Germany pre-war, and throughout the war with direct FDR awareness being undeniable.

His administration’s inaction on early warnings and evidence of American banking and corporate connections to the Nazis is glaring.

The FBI’s expansion under FDR, with J. Edgar Hoover’s growing influence, set the stage for surveillance overreach, and Allen Dulles’s later OSS/CIA ties show how deep elite networks ran—Dulles worked with Wall Street and European elites long before the CIA. Allen Dulles, had contacts with Nazi officials.

During the nineteen-thirties, the firm, where Allen Dulles was a partner, represented German industrial clients and helped move Nazi funds out of Germany as the Third Reich was collapsing in nineteen forty-four and nineteen forty-five.

They also incorporated German companies like I.G. Farben, which supported Germany’s arms buildup before the war.

Dulles also worked with SS General Karl Wolff against FDR’s "orders" and recruited ex-Nazis to work for the CIA.

The Bush family connection; Prescott Bush’s financial dealings tied to Standard Oil and German firms shared the same elite circles.

FDR’s push for rearmament and the Lend-Lease program leaned hard into global conflict,—Pearl Harbor shifted public opinion, but he was already aligning against the Axis.

Companies like IBM, through its German subsidiary Dehomag, provided punch-card technology that Nazi Germany used for organizing their war effort, including the Holocaust.

Citibank’s predecessor, National City Bank, and others like Chase Bank, had dealings in Nazi-occupied territories, pre-war and throughout the war , handling accounts and transactions tied to Nazi businesses.

Some American firms, like Ford and General Motors, also kept subsidiaries in Germany producing for the Nazi regime, often using forced labor.

It’s not just business, it’s aiding the enemy and perpetuating mass atrocity. These acts of course were not driven by profit or necessity, but fueling a system of perpetual power and control for global structures and systems, objective outright support of the enemy and their goals.

The U.S. government, including FDR’s administration, were objectively directly aware of these connections and dealings, they didn’t clamp down, they were complicit and perpetuated war, literally fueling the side our troops were sent to combat.

Again, it’s not just business, it’s aiding the enemy when American companies like Ford and GM kept their German subsidiaries running, producing vehicles and equipment for the Nazi war machine well into World War II.

Ford’s Berlin plant, Ford Werke, built thousands of trucks for the Wehrmacht, with roughly one-third of their 350,000 trucks by 1942 being Ford-made, crucial for blitzkrieg tactics.

GM’s Opel plants churned out bomber engines and trucks too, and both companies used forced labor, with destitute workers found in horrific conditions when U.S. troops liberated those factories.

The claim that these operations fully stopped once the U.S. entered the war in 1941 doesn’t hold up—documents show production continued, and executives like Ford’s Robert Schmidt even got Nazi honors for it.

As for Prescott Bush, his role with Union Banking Corporation, tied to Fritz Thyssen’s Nazi-linked funds, continued until the U.S. seized UBC’s assets in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Largely seen as a marketing ploy.

They let this go on for at least several years and finally it was too well known by too many to not do anything.

Like modern day fines against massive corporations, a relative slap on the wrist after their massive gains and unethical actions.

Also it was bare minimum done and only where they were pressed to take action.

No question, these were not just neutral business decisions; they propped up the Nazi effort before and during and after the war, war or no war.

Bitcoin’s appeal makes sense here—cutting out centralized systems that let elites skirt accountability.

American companies like Ford and GM profiting off Nazi Germany, Prescott Bush’s Union Banking Corporation ties to Thyssen’s Nazi funds—deserves straight-up acknowledgment. These weren’t just business moves; they were complicity with the enemy during wartime.

Beyond the gold confiscation with Executive Order 6102 in 1933, which forced Americans to surrender their gold at a fixed price, stripping away personal wealth control, FDR’s administration committed other criminal acts.

The internment of over 110,000 Japanese-Americans after Pearl Harbor, under Executive Order 9066, was a massive violation of civil liberties—whole families were uprooted, their property often lost or sold off cheap, with no due process. Many called it a shameful act, later acknowledged as such with reparations in the 1980s.

On the Nazi ties, FDR's administration didn’t stop major U.S. companies from doing business with Germany.

Standard Oil of New Jersey supplied fuel and patents to IG Farben, a key Nazi chemical giant, throughout the war.

IBM’s tech, as we discussed, aided Nazi logistics. These weren’t just rogue businesses; they operated under oversight, and FDR’s team turned a blind eye.

Prescott Bush’s Union Banking Corporation, linked to Nazi financier Fritz Thyssen, wasn’t seized until 1942, despite earlier red flags.

FDR’s New Deal was corrupt as well . The Works Progress Administration and other programs were criticized for political favoritism—jobs and contracts often went to loyal Democrats, not always the neediest.

Critics like Huey Long called it a machine to buy votes while centralizing power. The Supreme Court’s initial resistance to New Deal laws led to FDR’s infamous 1937 court-packing plan, an overreach to strong-arm the judiciary.

As for other unethical moves, the National Recovery Administration, part of the New Deal, forced businesses into government-set codes, which crushed small companies while favoring big players like those tied to Morgan or Rockefeller interests.

It was struck down as unconstitutional in 1935, but not before disrupting markets. These actions, from property seizures to obvious and object support of the enemy and thus their atrocities, show a pattern of prioritizing control and elite interests.

Bitcoin’s appeal, as you’d is that it sidesteps this kind of centralized power grab—nobody can seize your 12-word seed phrase like they did gold in ’33.

Bitcoin’s whole deal—those 12 words—means no government can pull that kind of stunt again.

And with bitcoin, people can leave hyper inflated currencies or dangerous areas including war zones with money that is unconfiscatable (invisible/ has no physical encumbrance), incorruptible/unstoppable and borderless.

nostr:nevent1qqsf6uafqe2umjmdddazrtykj2l57vujlprg6fsfjzm3xzcda75r4wspndmhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0y5erqamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd3skuep0y5erqffjxpshvct5v9ez2v3swaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5hj2v3sy5erqctkv96xzu39xgc8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6te9xgc8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7ffjxpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9ukldtgk