You can't just put a CC license on the song with an asterisked footnote that reads "just the bass, though."

CC *had* a sampling license: the "Sampling Plus 1.0" license. It was a *mess*. Licensees couldn't figure out what parts of works they were allowed to use, and licensors couldn't figure out how to coney that. It's been "retired."

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/

38/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So maybe Willingham should create his own bespoke license for *Fables*. That may be what he has to do, in fact. But boy is that a fraught business. Remember the army of top lawyers who created the CC licenses? They missed a crucial bug in the first three versions, and billions of works have been licensed under those earlier versions. This has enabled a mob of crooked #CopyleftTrolls (like @PixsyHQ) to prey on the unwary, raking in a fortune:

https://doctorow.medium.com/a-bug-in-early-creative-commons-licenses-has-enabled-a-new-breed-of-superpredator-5f6360713299

39/