do you know that peacekeepers don't stop whoever wants to fight?

they just separate the parties and watch to avoid unintentional scalation, accidents, etc.

At most, they avoid no-warning attacks and "the other side started shooting" blame wars because the parties are supposed to ask them to leave before attacking.

Before the 1967 war, Egypt asked the peacekepers to leave, and they left.

Last week, peacekeepers on Lebanon-Israel border stopped patrols and returned to their bases on their own volition - they are not going to work if one of the parties want to start shooting.

last month, russian peacekeepers did not fight Azerbaijan. Nagorno-Karabakh is gone for Armenia.

why would soldiers from 3rd countries accept to die?

if you mean having UN soldiers controlling Gaza, that is not peacekeeping, that is a territorial mandate, which is costlier and riskier. Who wants to run a neo-colony, have their own soldiers hunt terrorists, besides being blamed by every adminstrative or security trouble? And who is going to convince Hamas to leave?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You make good points. But I'm a problem-solver by nature and so I'm gonna keep trying to come up with solutions. Please forgive any naivity on my part.

nothing to forgive... that is the nature of brainstorming solutions.