Replying to Avatar Alex B.

>Yes but in this scenario you assume that most of the traffic will still happen on L1 directly ? Assuming most of the traffic move to L2s then it's not the case.

Blocks on L1 will be made full regardless, this will increase on-chain costs which are directly tied to the cost of transacting on the rollup. Bitcoin"s DA is extremely scarce and we know this creates a ceiling for rollups.

AFAIK it's well understood that rollups actually do a poor job of actually scaling though they have undeniable utility advancements.
Avatar
A₿del fgu 1y ago

> AFAIK it's well understood that rollups actually do a poor job of actually scaling though they have undeniable utility advancements.

What ? ZK rollups using state diffs (as opposed to sending compressed tx data) scale extremely well! It's the opposite, the more traffic you have on them the more efficient they are.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Alex B. 1y ago

If you want trustless ZK rollup you must use DA on Bitcoin.

This does not scale by default. You still need non-witness data therefore you only get 5-10x increase in the throughput depending on who you ask.

Avatar
Alex B. 1y ago

sorry missed zeros here say 30-50x.

still not a lot