Nice. That is consistent though with them acting in good faith though right? And I agree. Itโs potentially Orwellian.
Hereโs the paper I was referring to. I think youโre not saying that none of the respondents who are worried are acting in bad faith?
https://aiimpacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Thousands_of_AI_authors_on_the_future_of_AI.pdf 
Oops, I meant to screenshot a part about extinction. But you can see that in the paper too
Iโll read the paper n get back to you! ๐ซก but thereโs definitely safety concerns!! I just donโt believe that itโll do worst than itโll do good, I believe the trade offs will be significantly good for human kind in the long run. ๐ซ
I commit to sending 1k sats your way if you do ๐ซ
Yeah, I really hope youโre right. If that happens, humans will be free in a way weโve never seen before. Itโll be amazing. Luxury automated superabundance.
Idk what percent confidence Iโd assign that vs the other outcome, just know that extinction is >0% chance, and therefore, since quadrillions (to understate it) of lives are on the line, I think treading very carefully is super super important.
