honestly X86-64 architecture that both Intel and AMD run on is outdated garbage. Apple has the best silicon right now.

Running Linux on a new Macbook would be cool, but i am not into Linux and Apple OS runs neither CAD software i use nor Games i play.

but in terms of computing power per watt Apple silicon ( and Qualcomm Snapdragon X ) beat the shit out of X86-64 regardless of model of Intel or AMD cpu.

Snapdragon X ( even in Elite spec ) is still somewhat of an entry-level CPU while Apple chips range from entry level to high-end - certainly high end by notebook standards.

I would give Snapdragon X a few more years to scale up to higher performance levels but Apple silicon is ready, at least for notebooks.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

apple is very very good but you are then dependent on a single supplier. RISCV is best performance per watt, but that happens at very low watts... milliwatts.

yeah Apple can add or delete products from line up at will and they have switched CPU architectures in the past as well ( they used to run IBM power PC ) so they definitely can't be relied on.

or rather they can be relied on to produce a great laptop but not anything else and you can't know what CPU the laptop will use either.

apple is for people who need a $4,000 laptop machined from a single slab of aluminum ( oh no sorry, i meant to say "aluminium" ) to answer e-mails from starbucks.

then again we have a 9,000 lbs, 1,000 horsepower Hummer EV so that 5'2" women can have means of getting to their Zumba class two blocks down a suburban road without a single crack in the pavement.