that stands for Nostr Knowledge Base Implementation Possibility because it's a spec describing how to form a knowledge base.
a spec for a specific use case, not a new type of spec
that stands for Nostr Knowledge Base Implementation Possibility because it's a spec describing how to form a knowledge base.
a spec for a specific use case, not a new type of spec
Ok, so NUDs are a new idea then? What do you dislike about them? They seem to solve most of your complaints, in that they're:
- Permissionless
- Published in a wiki format
- Forkable and can be voted on
- Nostr-native
I personally don't have a problem with the specific idea. An NKBIP can perfectly have a NUD tag if someone wants to add it, i just don't think it adds more meaning than NKBIP.
Not an argument against a NUD, just that if things are already going to be so different, a global naming convention wouldn't make sense, and that NKBIP announces the purpose within its name.
There's value in posting a spec in a real wiki event.