Signal chief of board of directors advocates for censorship.
Signal’s mission is “speak freely”.
This is what I would call signal sending mixed signals.
How did a fight over the politics of who leads NPR lead to arguments that Signal’s encryption is somehow suspect?
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/may/18/npr-elon-musk-signal?CMP=share_btn_url
Discussion
It's the guardian lol
'The rightwing activist and propaganda guru Chris Rufo helmed the crusade...
Every effective smear campaign takes a grain of truth, then coats it in layers of innuendo...'
It's smear campaign Vs smear campaign. It's smear campaigns all the way down lolol.
I'm not really following the story tbh, but the guardian do also run smear campaigns obvs
It’s by Renee DiResta, the author of Invisible Rulers: The People Who Turn Lies Into Reality, and the technical research manager at Stanford Internet Observatory.
SIO does tons of good research.
The politics is all too tiresome.
There remains an unanswered question.
Meredith’s silence on the censor on the board is not great.
nostr:note1ya3z243dyk0h085nzh5d89d39rtuqmenjeuh4tklrnjxg579a0ns6ym02s
I really don't know the situation but I assume both sides of smear campaign seesaw appeal the authority ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ that's usually the case anyway.
I was just pointing out that
'Every effective smear campaign takes a grain of truth, then coats it in layers of innuendo'
Seems to also apply to the same article that makes this statement.(?)
Will watch this at some point. Not sure why people are taking about her CIA links(?lol)
Seems like a curious figure tho 🫡