I think spam is a difficult issue as it's subjective. Using nostr:npub1nym2200088t397yx43lza4gfec3rk56gxnwjnk2u4w5ld0qpau6sskc7fq as an example, my guess is he got caught in the amethyst spam filter twice. 1 he regularly posts the same "what's for supper ..." message which I believe nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z has said amethyst blocks accounts with the same post multiple times. 2 at one point he was zapping 1 sat to every post which some people complained about and likely blocked him for. While I don't consider either of these spam and actually like to see them, I can see how some may call that spam. Which is why I think the current amethyst spam filter while well intentioned without being able to opt out is too far. I respect Vitor's position that software should be opinionated, and that open source allows it to be forked. In relatively new ecosystem like this I think it's healthy and in the long run will lead to the best software and user experience.