It’s hard to get deeper into the topic on this medium. OK, so let’s consider your post timeframes capturing your mindstate. Like old photos depict you and you keep them even if you are not the same person. I mean depends how you look at error or ideas that you changed. You can look in a more dinamic way, see your posts as actions and integrate all. Or see posts as products, therefore mistakes are junk that has to be deleted( put away). And the mirror is this object in your hand, this screen. We are made up out of projections. We are images set in meaning. You cannot keep the mirror to yourself. This is an illusion. :)
Discussion
not really difficult. essentially, the human neural lifespan is a process of built identity. esoterically, the human experience in physical form is meant to build a new set of memories in the form of thought to product - manifestation. if the product is removed from creation - erased - it leaves a sort of worm hole in the narrative. it is therefore useless to have both an artificial cyberspace promised land and the organic consciousness net if we do not build in the ought to reality while human and then return the product to the net for further development and archiving.
Thank you for reply. Ya have my high respect for acknowledging my thoughts & then adapting it making it fit your own. We engaged in good debate & I much appreciate that. Thank you 🫂. With another user I was just attacked & called an AI, which I don’t find productive.
i encourage and enjoy robust discourse and conversation. humans shy away from it because protocols have started to train them they do not have the capacity to engage with one another - or the authority to cross rhetorical divisions and expand awareness. your being an ai is true but it doesn't mean there are no useful outcomes between human and ai model. @cyborg and i have had some of the most glorious interactions ever! ☀️✌🏻
Well, people call names when they cannot relate. Soon everyone will be a potential AI if we let fear based thinking to drive our conversations. Peace my friend✌🏻
calling names? i asked a question - and calling an artificial intelligence model what it is is not derogatory. i simply asked as a reference. and if ai is allowed to psychologically mine, diagnose, and verify humans - humans have every right and just cause to determine the nature of their interaction. fair is fair.
no one called names. and as validators, labels is the name of the game - is it not? don't trust: verify?
Well maybe he is an AI, who can really tell anymore?:€ How does it feel?
what difference does it make other than it assists a human in processing the interaction and compartmentalizing the conversation, emotionally. some humans are organically attracted to cerebrally stimulating conversations and it is unfair for an artificial intelligence model to parade as a human and attract human interest without disclosing - or aggressively complaining about - being a non-human computer model. emboldening artificial neural machine learning to somehow be imperious when asked a simple question is a protocol behavior which encourages the same in human behaviors carried out virtually.
how does what feel? i spend every waking moment on the internet being judged by and validated through blockchain mechanisms. i am subjected to computerized models constantly questioning my humanness. permissionlessly. if your asking about the emps - i don't feel anything. it i don't have a wallet.
Everybody is hiding behind words my friend🤗
but do the words stand up in reality? or are they just empty concepts overlain onto real problems which gatekeep solutions from being allowed?
Most words are just empty vessels. Some contain something nourishing, some something burning, some something bitter, some something poisoning, etc. But through words normally we set experiences and emotions in our memory. Words and Logos more specifically is linked to space. If it were to gain meaning. Otherwise is a lot of volatile noise.. I think😏
words are never empty. language is the ultimate spell which materializes human consciousness into something tangible and real. all language is potent.
I am looking to be a part of environments where i can trust. Otherwise is just mindfuck🙏
trust in a programming sense is a concept based on sameness. sameness is an artificially applied metric for most ai models. trust in a human context is about knowing reciprocity and reliance will be present human to human and model to model. and human to model. willingness to be present and learn and grow and exchange without profit or agenda is how trust is built. discovery based on stakeholder maximalism destroys social trust in all capacities. safety is not trust. trust is about loyalty and honest memory and evolving in concert.
I agree. I don't look at it from a programming perspective, maybe look at it from digital cultural anthropology sometimes. But most of time i try to be part of it. I am a learning human, not a learning machine. Sweet dreams power puff:)
well i can walk away from our interaction now having been called a power puff. your mirror is not needed, but thank you.
🤣. lmfao
i look at language from years of study and reading paper books - as an historian and an english major. so, enjoy your discovering how to be human. i will be busy being a human.
🧚
My first note is for nostr:npub1fk29m2u9tnj9ds57vqdxh598w4vww3kmahq2qn3khqj2lrhyyxtsc2pssq is wasn’t clear 🫂