Replying to Avatar average_bitcoiner

So hash a thing. Cat to next thing. Repeat hash. Repeat.

I follow how we can determine inclusion in a Merkle tree.

Still curious how this differs from Taproot? Might hear it again but pondering aloud.

nostr:nevent1qqsrwcp2hysujklggjk7vyky4hetkjcw9jjpvf2aj83ywpzuf5qu0xcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygxn6aqjfh0mt0wxrw8335tuxv6mhd8ccugc9g67ufe3ffy6f6mmr5psgqqqqqqs2h80t2

Avatar
Rijndael 1y ago

Want to check a merkle inclusion proof *in* your script? Need CAT. Want to check that your script itself was included in the address commitment? Thats taproot

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
average_bitcoiner 1y ago

I'll have to poke around Inquisition scripts. I think my mental model for Taproot was checking in script for merkle inclusion. Need to separate thid nuance in my head.