Make nip 05 providers also email providers. I realize this adds a large burden for providers if they want to provide an email client, but they don't necessarily have to do that. I made my NIP 05 (hodlbod@coracle.social) into an email address with an MX record. NIP 05's could do that with users' existing providers.
Lots of sharp edges there, but I really think the right UX is to have the same name for both protocols.
People don't want yet another email address they don't check; I suppose the NIP-05 could just become an email forwarder to the user's real email address though
Yeah, I think the default should be either to forward messages to the user's real email, or an auto-responder that says it's not an email address (or both).
I am wedgesocial@nostrplebs.com
That is both my Zap and email address. It's slick easy to use and how I currently get nonkyc
Embrace the dual protocol single address
Using an email adress (new or excisting) sounds very logic for me. Than the onboarding can become much more normie-proof.
