I'm absolutely saying that if the only source you have is X that is a low quality source and I have better things to do with my time.
Even with those people on board, it still fails a credibility check that it was only used once. The whole world knew Japan was going to surrender and we still dropped nuclear bombs on them twice. This would be a much more precise weapon that literally and figuratively has less fallout.
I don’t get your last point. You’re claiming they don’t have it because they didn’t use it over 80 years ago?
You are saying they have a weapon that let's them bend space time but incredulous that I would imply they should use it in the past? That argument isn't even internally consistent. Why can't they use it in the past if that is what you say it does?
That wasn't what I said though. I was practicing reasoning by analogy. You say they have developed a new superweapon that only they have. We can imagine what that looks like by looking at history for past times when that happened, nuclear bombs. This doesn't look like that at all for a variety of reasons.
I never said or implied anything near weapon or super weapon. You steered that way by yourself.
Bending space time does not exactly mean ability to time travel to whatever year you want. I should’ve been more specific. My context and interest resides with the original content that Marty shared from Ashton Forbes. Who is a very diligent researcher and technically inclined. He focuses more on “bending space”, faster than light travel, warp drives, and free energy. https://youtube.com/@justxashton
There's no video evidence they haven't used it. That's the basis for this belief.
As if these people wouldn't be crying "fake" in the same way should there be more videos of the same thing. The same people who think gravity is bending and warping for spacetime. LOL
I’m not sure if I’m interpreting your first sentence correctly with a double negative and perhaps a missing comma. Regardless, this is the video evidence: https://youtu.be/mxJhHyusOps
