nostr:npub16nefft85cck8cxq9jg55kft9636j04nzct4zz38asc4wg73hdfzqmethh0 sounds aligned with what Dr Narco Longo says.
. His theory that the first millennium should be reduced to just three centuries, however, may no overcome all objections. In a nutshell, Heinsohn hypothesizes two major distortions in our textbook timeline, one resulting in an extension of roughly three centuries, the other inserting four centuries.
Twin Events and Phantom Centuries in Late Antiquity?
The Larsson-Ossowski dendrochronological challenge
https://www.unz.com/article/twin-events-and-phantom-centuries-in-late-antiquity/
Discussion
nostr:npub1ass0jtvg7k06gguhlwm04p7qrfcanpeaf892zfguuhwujv0yjtjq2tuvnd nostr:npub16nefft85cck8cxq9jg55kft9636j04nzct4zz38asc4wg73hdfzqmethh0
Interesting.
I've heard several arguments related to insertions and/or deletions of periods even before the first millennium.
Many are due to misinterpreting words, like assigning YEAR but it was actually MONTH, shifting the timeline.