Mining nodes are *incentivized* to behave
Non-economic nodes are reliant on code to “peer in” to the same honest chain for querying transaction data
You are bound to a trail with an immutable hash footprint
Any transaction that honors underlying protocol consensus is a *valid tx*
*non standard/out of band txs just mean non standard for an individual users mempool policy*
*mempool policy is a subjective, personal layer of observation- you can configure and change this of your own volition*
Bitcoin cores removal of op_return limits changes the fee environment for non-monetary transactions that are seen as *misbehaving*… it makes it costly to submit them rather than them being submitted and shoved into a different part of the witness data
This is actually in greater alignment with Satoshis vision and underlying consensus design
Strict mempool policies are NOT! They undermine privacy over a certain threshold of mining activity
You’re shooting yourself in the foot anon
Privacy txs are larger than 42-bytes
Why would you not want miners honoring private transactions?
Why would you want to incentivize a majority of minors to misbehave against the intended design?
This is manipulative at this point