Replying to Avatar sommerfeld

>The costs of maintaining a fork are quite high.

They don't have to maintain a fork, that is only 1 of the options. They can use their fork as a proxy to open PRs in github/gitlab/etc using the nostr submitted patches.

> what if they could create a repo event which highlights that they are not the maintainer

Why not just submit the repo event with an empty maintainers list? It's essentially the same thing, or not? 🤔
Avatar
DanConwayDev 1y ago

no. nip34 wording:

> `["maintainers", "", ...]`

perhaps it should be:

> `["maintainers", "", ...]` // optional: if omitted, author is sole maintainer

I think this might break a number of existing repo events.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.