Bitcoin depends on you if any of these apply👇
• You’re HODLing
• You’re running a node
• You're mining BTC
• You’re studying bitcoin
• You’re using it for payments
• You’re contributing to its software
That’s how the network stays strong, by the people, for the people.
I am too far behind to deeply understand the implications of this op_return debacle. What are the key point of nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpp4mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7tcpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7l3vw43 on the matter?
Unlimited op_return bloats the chain, making node running harder and enabling more shit to get on chain that is not a monetary transaction.
Knots node implementation allows for customised filters that hinders the proliferation of non-monetary tx data on chain.
That's a head scratcher. I'd agree with this, but this also treads on the freedom of speech that many of us uphold with pride. I wouldn't want to be a bitcoin developer in this climate
If people believe that Bitcoin should be a platform for speech, then we can propose adding/allowing all sorts of data types. I don't think this.
I want Bitcoin to be a monetary network and should be limited to just monetary transactions as far as possible.
As OP_RETURN has no Witness discount, it bloats the blockchain less than inscription. Luke claims to be worried about CSAM.
He certainly has no lack of self confidence. And bothers hiding a lot of replies that mention his delusions of grandeur.
...
