I’m a bit disappointed in Trezor, they discontinued developing the CoinJoin feature and never embraced the chance to run their own coordinator service for their users. But they are fully onboard staking shitcoins with their hww… not the priorities we need right now.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Trezor is security theater and a marketing machine. Just like most hardware wallet makers by the way. But Ledger and Trezor are kind of the worst. (and their stuff sux-)

Yeah, they did quite a good job implementing the WabiSabi protocol with hardware wallet signing. It does require a USB connection and a number of pre-approved rounds to sign, which is not the gold standard airgapped PSBT method. They trade-off towards usability.

They did a great job with their CoinJoin client but the war on privacy (on privacy-preserving developers, really) is something that scares everybody, and even then they made the move. However, look at what happened with other wallets after the Samourai devs were arrested: they removed the coinjoin functionality immediately, they didn't desabled it but removed the code enterely. Well Trezor didn't do that! The CoinJoin feature is still there and you can still use it. Or even better, you can take that code to create your own client which, by the way, is 99% of the code required (the CoinJoin coordinator is just about the 1%).