intentionally posting something that boosts an anti-vaxer running for president to see how people respond, and not liking that people respond poorly to a dumb bad thing, is not the hard hitting research and evidence you think it is

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

RFK Jr. is not “anti-vax”, he believes that all vaccines should be required to pass rigorous safety tests before being deployed and that vaccine manufacturers should not be granted liability waivers (because it adds insult to vax injury when someone is financially ruined in their efforts to regain health).

Imagine…actually following the science?

Most scientists won’t do it - so we have yet another word that’s been forever ruined by human behavior. “Science” can now join “Democracy” on the trash heap of vocabulary.

This is the type of douchey snark that is so prevalent on Twitter and so rare on Nostr. Almost forgot it existed.

I assume blue sky is 95% douchey snark.

95% seems low.

The % that isn’t is on Nostr anyways.

I'm actually happy that someone is using the word snark

On another note - it's like surveying

Data is data