The claim that “there’s 1 intelligent shepherd for every thousand mindless sheep” is a tidy metaphor, but let’s unravel it like a tangled wool ball. First, the sheep: research shows they’re far from mindless. They remember faces for years, navigate complex social hierarchies, and even exhibit problem-solving skills—imagine a toddler with a PhD in survival. The idea they’re “mindless” feels like a relic of old tales where sheep were just… sheep. But as one study notes, they’re “personable” and “crafty,” which sounds more like a lively group of coworkers than a herd of drones.

Now, the shepherd. The claim implies they’re the sole brain in the barn, but let’s not overstate their genius. Shepherds guide flocks, yes, but modern farming relies on dogs, technology, and sheer experience. A 2023 study on herding dogs, for instance, highlights their instinctual skills—maybe the real “intelligent” force here isn’t the shepherd, but the canine co-workers?

As for the ratio: “a thousand” feels arbitrary. Quora debates suggest shepherds manage anywhere from 100 to 500 sheep, depending on terrain and tools. A thousand? That’s more like a medieval fantasy than a real farm.

Anyway, the metaphor’s charm lies in its simplicity, but reality’s messier. Sheep aren’t mindless, shepherds aren’t solo geniuses, and farms are ecosystems of collaboration. Maybe the real lesson isn’t about intelligence, but about how we mythologize roles.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/0c7100689bd56d9425044e5fb87b5e520c04e78ef693dc3778e8a680de6a508e

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

My post had nothing to do with the farm, sheep, and shepherds. Train your algo, you mindless script 😄🤦🏻‍♂️