Nostr Web Client

Part 1/2

Short:

it's all about control, when people can connect and have deep conversations, than they need to do better work

Little bit longer, more details:

People in power want a group that is passive in their thinking, "they absolutely don't want a group who can think for themselves, critical thinkers who are sharing information, because it almost make it impossible to hide the truth🔎🤔🔦",

when (we) too many people know the truth than the people in power are obliged to take responsibility and make it better for the whole group, it's easier for them to serve a smaller group rich/wealthy people

themselves can stay in power, they are afraid that the real information (hidden agenda) that the implementation is no longer possible, if we stay dumb and brainwashed they have total power/control without any responsibility for the damage they cause to the masses...👀😵‍💫😓 🩵

😨 Politics is a dirty game 🔎😬😬😮‍💨

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bob Social, 5mo ago

Part 2/2

When we come together as 1 big group, it's game over for evil wrong doing...

Politics =

Rule nr 1. "Stay in power",

Nr 2. "Create chaos => than we think we need them to solve the problems (in secret, the problems they created, because of their OWN BIG EGO"

Nr 3. "Keep the masses distracted at all times and destroy togetherness/destroy real connections => when we are unhappy we spend more🤔🔦" and because we the masses can't agree, they have free rein, is easier for them to stay in power.

Nr 4. Protecting the real goals/ hidden agenda, when the truth doesn't come out, they can do whatever they want without justifying themselves.

Nr 5. Confuse the masses, (when we are confused, we waste more time on stupid stuff , we waste energy and don't have the energy to focus on what's important.

ZAPLOTTO 5mo ago

Pretty good approximation of a neo-marxist analysis

Bob Social, 5mo ago

Honestly, it's my own observation, I don't like being put in a box/category, we are more complex than 1 category

I looked up neo-marxist analysis, and my observation looks like the category of neo-marxist analysis,

(but I prefer myself as an observer in search for the real objective truth no matter the categories, I don't see myself as a neo-marxist analyser.)

My opinion: "categories limit our critical and creative thinking, sometimes we need to think out of the box/category

When we accept the category that our environment attributes to us, than we create our own thinking limitation and our curiosity.

This reaction is not an attack, because you are right with your observation:

"I react only, because I don't (never) want to be limited to 1 category."

----------

Your observation and knowledge, made me learn something new🙂

ZAPLOTTO 5mo ago

Thanks for this honest, friendly and interesting response.

Nobody wants to be categorised or "boxed in", that's the way our brain (fortunately) works.

But for some inexplicable reason we also seem to be obsessed with the search for a "real objective truth". This is in contradiction with our desire not to be "boxed in".

Making this obvious is my joy. This is why I provoke.

Happy to be in touch with you. Caute.

Ava 5mo ago

Well, you seem to be in a very soft mood today, my friend.

ZAPLOTTO 5mo ago

Won't last

Bob Social, 5mo ago

PS:

ZAPLOTTO, 1 category that I could accept is

I'm a Bitcoiner😁🥳,

not a Bitcoin Maxi🤔🤔🤔,

I believe: "Bitcoin is King☺️❗️😤😌"

ZAPLOTTO 5mo ago