Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Patrick

Bitcoin is certainly an asset that's not regulated nor is the market regulated unless you're looking at a minority of centralized exchanges or the ETFs. There may still be some archaic laws on value transfer but Bitcoin certainly could care less about enforcing those as a standard.

Bisq and RoboSats would also likely disagree that unregulated exchanges are suicide. They seem to service their market well without need for state sponsorship.

Regardless I still stand that state sponsorship or regulations on how money can be moved between free participants do anyhing to make assets any safer. GameStop holders would likely be questioning where their protections were when the market makers didn't like the way things worked in their regulated market.

Avatar
Vortex | CTV | LNHANCE 1y ago

There are regulated exchanges and markets for bitcoin all around the world and the volume is certainly not a "minority", the decentralized exchange volume like Bisq and the like in comparison is minuscule.

Regulated markets have the most volume for a reason.

Also literally no one said bitcoin itself cared about law.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Zazon 1y ago

Mining pools could be required to not include transactions that were not initiated by a Virtual Asset Service Provider like a CEX .

Thread collapsed