yes this is how I interpreted it, because the shared secret is the only secret involved during encryption. So when people say “dms will leak your private key!” I assumed they meant shared secret. If shared secret could leak private key that would be pretty bad and ECDH would be insecure.
This risk is further reduced if relays start putting DMs behind AUTH too, isn’t it?
Please Login to reply.
That is an anti-pattern
Ser
Exposing sensitive data to fewer people is an anti-pattern? 🤨
The entire concept of broadcasting sensitive 1:1 communication to the whole world would seem to be the antipattern.
