I'm starting to get the sense that Peter Todd and Jameson Lopp are philosophically and economically illiterate. Is it true that Peter wanted tail emissions? I used to think that was potentially a better policy too, up until quite recently, until I realized some things, quite a few points, as to why it would weaken Bitcoin if embraced and is completely unnecessary. They're rather shortsighted if they think they can see everything. It took me a long time to figure out the economics of tail emissions vs no tail emissions to where I understood the tradeoffs.