That's a good analysis. These types of people are unlikely to ever admit they were wrong or fooled about anything; they'll take their egos to their graves rather than concede anything.

I'm still not informed enough on topics like viruses to have a definitive opinion; truthfully there are inconsistencies on both views that I cannot reconcile or explain at this point. But I am always open to hearing people out, which is probably how I was able to arrive at many of my current beliefs.

I recommend venturing into the musing of Ken Wheeler (I shared one of his videos earlier) for some insights into unorthodox topics relating to metaphysics (waves, particles, atomism, relativity, etc.) which I think are much closer to reality than we what we all think/thought we know about the world. I don't think he's a flat earther, I have never heard him mention the subject, but his world view does go hand-in-hand with a lot of what us flat-earthers think. At this point my perspective is that much of modern science is on shaky ground.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

To that last point, 💯%

I think everything since the war which is not demonstrable to ordinary people (eg this internet thing seems to really work) is highly suspect. Probably before the war there was some dodgy science too which hasn't been ferreted out but I trust the old process much more strongly than "peer review".