Nope. You can't do anything with a screenshot of numbers.
But I can enjoy this art just as much as the dumbass who bought it, I can send it, I can remint it and no Blockchain can protect the "owners" property rights to this image.
I own this image, it's in my possession and you can't take it off my phone.
So. You understand why each Satoshi is unique and cannot be copied. You understand that only the key to an asset is the proof of ownership over this asset.
But strangely you assume that this does not apply to other blockchains.
But you just ignore that it's the same for NFTs on another Blockchain than Bitcoin. In fact you do ignore that each NFT has an id, can have properties and last but not least: It is the proof that it's the original.
I can also make a screenshot of 100k Sats and mint this 100k Sats on virtually every Blockchain but it still won't be the same Satoshi like it is on the bitcoin blockchain.
Some might call it selective perception. I call it ignorant and dumb. Both apply when you understand bitcoin and make this stupid claim of a screenshot being the same as an asset on a blockchain.
With your logic it is the same if you
Buy a print of a picasso or the original painting of picasso. And I might repeat myself here .. this is dumb.
It is not proof of being the original. It is proof of being minted.
How do I know the artist didn't keep a copy of the original psd/AI file on their computer?
That does not matter because his copy on his harddrive is not the minted asset on the blockchain with attributes that cannot be saved on his harddrive.
But it's amazing how you just ignore the majority of what I have written. But I learned that ignoring things and facts is what most Bitcoinmaxis do.
You know that it is dumb. But the narrative has to be fed.
