Replying to Avatar ponymontana💜⚡

thats a kind of tail emission, the one implemented in Monero, for example, is progressively decreasing unless the new emission is something like 3 xmr every block, and from then it will be 3 xmr every block forever (unless shitcoin dies).

I think constant-value-emission like that is still another way to tend with different paces to ~0% inflation, so still pretty the same functions.

Is more a question of "numbers choosed to put in the functions" that "determines the speed" and makes the differences.
Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

monero's market cap has stayed flat though, even though its supply rate is constant. this means its losing users as fast as the printer go brrr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ponymontana💜⚡ 1y ago

mmm yeah but because it is a shitcoin, its how they works, I dont think the tail emission is determinant in this

ed
ede3d957... 1y ago

No, it means CEX have been weaponized against it to suppress prices. And Bitcoiners failing to notice that when screaming ngl are not yet prepared for the coming fractional reserve era in Bitcoin. Where 99% of its users, individuals and institutions alike give a fuck about self-custody.

Every shitcoin with much higher inflation performs better than Monero. What's your explanation for that?

After all you might have figured out that the Monero crowd are the only people also seeing value in Bitcoin and Nostr for its unique properties.

Monero hashrate is at ATH.

Real transactions (not from CEX to HWW to CEX) are growing.

Where Monero is directly accepted by a merchant it usually ranks #1 or #2.

Ruling the only free market (darknet)

Avatar
mbl 1y ago

There is a huge difference between holders and users. Bitcoin is held, not used. Monero is used, not held (for now).