also, i thought you at some point lived in deuctschland

i walked through the western region, where you talk about having lived, very recently, or now, and saw very many deer running about, and hides for hunters to shoot them

why do the farmers shoot the deer?

you answer that question

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I live in Germany, now. They have to shoot the deer because they shot the wolves.

But that's rifles for hunting.

Americans stockpile arsenals for Armageddon or something.

what is it in your mind that makes the idea of having weapons to kill things some kind of sin?

if you need computers for only counting your taxes then what about that eh?

oh, you have a computer, are you earning taxable income that we should know about?

how about go fuck yourself, i will use technology in my house hold, my CASTLE as i deem fit, and you, racketeer, eat lead?

It doesn't. I'm not a pacifist. I just note that it doesn't seem to make people more resistent to tyranny.

Because of game theory, I assume.

threat is a cost to the attacker

if it costs me the risk of getting my head blown off, i may consider it more economic to be peaceful

Yes, I'm saying it works the other way around, too. If my first move is to blow someone's head off, I may consider it more economic to be peaceful.

Guns make both sides more peaceful. 🤷‍♀️

tyranny has been sliding in like a creepy rapist to everyone nonstop everywhere they speak latinic languages for the last 150 years

Yeah. I'm saying that the American arsenals haven't stopped that because using them is too draconian.

It's just something I think about, sometimes.

Arsenals are useful in a violent war, but who wants to start a war?

I have a steaming hot take here:

It hasn’t stopped them because people are weak now. Why take the guns when you can weaken the ones holding them until they’re useless?