nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn, although I think this is a bug on nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m's client since there is already information enough on my note for it to be able to fetch the parent, there is definitely something weird going on in my note's tags, generated by Coracle. There are 3 "e" tags, the "root" is not really the root and the last one, unmarked, is the actual root, I think.
Discussion
The note I'm replying to is not using marked tags, but still it should be obvious that it has only two "e" tags, the first is the root, the second is the immediate parent, per NIP-10 old standard.
