Question:
What would be the hypothetical benefit of removing as many people as possible from Crowdstrike?
Discussion
Always got to consider the reverse pimp
Being able to push more malware surreptitiously?
That’s what I would think, but I’m wondering what people with more exposure to large scale IT might see that i dont.
Crowdstrike is primarily for business customers. Typically, nearly every business is under some type of obligation or expectation to run EDR software. So even if these companies go off crowdstrike, the expectation will be that they go to another provider. Generally, they’ll turn to Microsoft for Defender for Endpoint, which is more advanced than the Defender that comes preinstalled in windows.
You didn’t answer the question.
The answer is that they won’t be off it without replacing it…
Replacing it will make very little difference, if any. Most of these EDRs are extremely similar and only vary slightly in performance. So the only benefit would be if you’re hoping to get them to MS or another vendor. But running a business that is any bigger than say 50-100 employees without EDR is very unlikely, especially for regulated entities.
So, there’s no real difference or any party other than competitors that bebwfit