There's still 21m Bitcoins and theres no one controlling it.

All I you and everyone need to know

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Facts ๐Ÿ’ฏ

Thats not true. When Bitcoin first started trading at a Japanese exchange millions of coins were stolen because of spies inside the core development team. No currency is more important for an totalitarian state environment than Bitcoin. I do not say thats bad, I think its good.

โ€ฆ and you can short Bitcoin.

What part was wrong? Can someone change rules how my coins works or have someone addes or removed coins? Both are no ๐Ÿ˜„

Exchanges have to provide liquidity. I dunno whats traded there some fancy IOUs maybe. If all the trading takes place in the outer layers, and states start into the mining business to take full control over it, it does not matter if 21m is written in the whitepaper as long as the state can control for what you spend. Nothing will matter in the endโ€ฆ the bitcoin was a trick of some central banks to gain absolute control over gouvernments thru devaluate their currency in my opinion. As I sad I think transparency is general a good thing.

Its not that 21m is written in whitepaper. Its that my note wont accept IOU's.

Price is thing that could be manipulated and keys stolen by malicious softwares, but still at protocol level theres 21m coins and no one in charge, becouse they cant change nodes running on peoples machines.

*my node

Is your node relevant if 51% of the network is controlled by big money ? BSV Bitcoin satoshi Vision for example does not allow public nodes for this readon of regulation. They are much more efficient thru dynamic block size. The danger of decentralized money would devaluate the coin imediately. Simply do a hardfork and sell your token on the street. Have a look what it will be worth without a financial insitution guaranteeing for.

Its. If 99% nodes fork themself out, my node will still do same as usual. I still can move my coins how ever i choose and do what ever i want with them.

Just like now, bitcoin controlling over 50% of network and still BSV bagholders and grifters can follow their BSV rules.

In the end, i dont care where big money is flowing. Thats not how good things are made.

Things are good if they are, and only time will tell.

BSV could be one attracting some big money, but while its needing trust from centralized entity, its going to fail at some point when devalued etc. Bitcoin in the end will last forever.

And im tired, so mayby readed you wrong.

If you was talking 51% attack (mining), i dont care if they following the rules and if i do care then i will start mining. If they dont follow i still dont care, they playing different game.