Generally speaking, the most naturally talented group of students are recruited by prestigious universities. Therefore, it's only natural that they have a higher probability of achieving success after graduation. So, is their success due to their innate talent, or is it due to the education they received from prestigious universities? I personally think their innate talent plays a larger role. If the education at prestigious universities were truly that powerful, they should be able to recruit the students with the worst academic performance and still cultivate the same rate of success. Only then could the main credit be attributed to the education provided by the prestigious universities. However, people often attribute the credit to the prestigious universities, while neglecting the students' inherent excellence.