Anyone got a few IQ points for me? I just lost a few reading this and I only made it halfway before I had to just shut it down. This is the block size wars all over again. These people just want to turn BTC into a shitcoin because they want it to do everything shitcoins do but in reality they are just adding validity to the Base Layer because they know it’s sound money or they would go use ETH instead.
The amount of opinions being claimed as facts are staggering!
That’s basically correct.
My node, my rules. They can fork off if they want but I’m not even considering a drivechain argument until fees are above 500sats/VB consistently. Even then it’s probably not a good solution to scaling.
To me, they’re just trying to drive miner revenue. That’s the only incentive which means they have a large interest in mining or something of the sorts. This isn’t a “good for everyone” improvement, it’s a good for their wallets proposal.
My only concern is I don’t think I can chose which version to run on nostr:npub1aghreq2dpz3h3799hrawev5gf5zc2kt4ch9ykhp9utt0jd3gdu2qtlmhct if it ever comes down to it. Need to dive into that further.
