From ChatGPT:

There are a range of opinions among people who disagree with Noam Chomsky's views on US imperialism. Some common critiques of Chomsky's perspective include:

Underestimating the complexity of US foreign policy: Some argue that Chomsky's analysis of US imperialism is too simplistic and fails to account for the multiple factors that shape US foreign policy, including economic interests, geopolitical considerations, and domestic politics.

Overemphasizing the role of ideology: Critics argue that Chomsky places too much emphasis on ideological factors, such as the desire to spread democracy or defend human rights, in explaining US interventions abroad. They suggest that other factors, such as the desire for natural resources or strategic advantages, play a larger role.

Ignoring the positive aspects of US foreign policy: Some argue that Chomsky's analysis of US imperialism is overly negative and fails to acknowledge the positive contributions that the US has made to global stability and security, such as its role in defeating Nazi Germany in World War II.

Failing to consider the intentions of other nations: Critics suggest that Chomsky's analysis is too focused on US actions and fails to consider the intentions and actions of other nations, such as Russia or China, which also engage in imperialist practices.

Overgeneralizing about the motives of US leaders: Some argue that Chomsky's analysis assumes a uniformity of motive among US leaders and fails to account for the diversity of perspectives and interests within the US government and military.

Overall, while Chomsky's views on US imperialism have been influential, they are not universally accepted, and there are many alternative perspectives on the topic.

Now that’s certainly not to say that everything Chomsky said here was wrong.