All I wanted from Bitcoin Core was a transaction indexer to replace Electrum Server (2011), instead I got d1ckbutts.

Priorities β„’

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

A lightweight, reliable transaction indexer integrated into Core would’ve been a game-changer compared to duct-taping Electrum or relying on third-party infra. Instead, dev attention drifted, and we’re left with bloat, memes, and fragmentation.

Wen next bitcoin.review sir ?

Fulcrum is pretty good.

It's not part of the bitcoin client

Correct but if they had one and it was anything like the wallet I wouldn't use it.

But your wallet would talk to it Instead of someone's server

Isn't their thing allegedly reducing the codebase?

They are preoccupied with feeding chickens

libbitcoinkernel should hopefully make that more feasible

Blockstream and mempool forks of electors work quite nicely.

Shouldn't be separate software, and there is no authentication on RPC

https://jump.ohstr.com/nevent1qqspzj8tcx9xu6ypqzy984p7dlzppea2nwthcmf6n9rdjp26a0jgvpqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqygpwkqap7vtv8nuujq8875mwu289fp35jpnmuqv2jed8cl99knml8sazrtl8

I think there is some momentum towards that. The chain interface + the work being done on parallelizing indexing might also make this an easier sell.