I’ve heard something similar but the appendix doesn’t seem to serve that function in other animals. It seems to be necessary for breaking down plant foods.
But your initial point is that these animals seem to be intentionally designed. How can you believe in both?
Both science and intentional design? Someone or something knew enough science to intentionally design them.
Right but if we evolve based on survival of the fittest, certain traits will not make sense. Like I said about the tail bone. That’s not an intentional design. That’s a vestigial body part. Why design us with tails that we’ll inevitable lose when we could’ve just been designed without them at all? Seems like a waste of energy.
