23 psi - The Music Ain't Over (Crystal Distortion's Gotham Hijack Mix)
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz9yHSI9iYM
Wordle 973 4/6*
⬛⬛🟩🟩⬛
🟨⬛🟩🟩⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/index.html
#Worldle #757 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
🧭⭐🚩🔤🗣️👫🪙📐
La palabra del día #772 4/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Le Mot (@WordleFR) #769 4/6
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟨⬛🟨
🟩⬛🟩🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Framed #708 (nope. I have never watched Warlock, but last night I gave Warlock 2 a try. There was a period, from about 1989 to 1994, in film, and an extent in real life, where the general aesthetics was cool charity shop, or cool thrift store. In that there wasn't a fixed aesthetic, and it was all jumbled together from the previous decades. Maybe a result of the economic downturns of the early 1990s or a reaction against the overt consumer aesthetics of the 1980s, and/or it was the children of parents who were teenagers in the 1960s. Simple explanations are mostly rubbish. It was a bloody awful film. It's the kind of film that gives credence to the idea of people with terrible ideas moving to LA to seek their fortune. I like thrift stores and charity shops because they are often interesting. I'm sure the actors did their best with what was available. The special effects were, and I could be wrong - I haven't checked , it looked like it - were in part Newtek Video Toaster* and the usual latex and corn-syrup gore. There were a few interesting shots, like in the loft, that were either composite frames to simulate a tilt shift lens or were an actual tilt shift lens. I don't think so because the field of view was inconsistent for a tilt shift lens. I think it was Video Toaster compositing. I wouldn't watch Warlock 2 again but I gave it a thumbs up on Prime Video for existing. I would, however, watch Warlock 1 because I haven't seen it. Overall 2 Leprechauns out of 5. I'll do Wordall when I'm awake.)
🎥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥 🟥