Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar jimmysong

"Jimmy and I agreed there is no economic incentive to use bigger up returns, right? so it's basically two sides of a coin. If nobody's going to use it, we should not enable it or we are not worried about enabling it, right? But either way, if nobody's going to use it, it's probably a pretty marginal issue." - @Murch

I would say that there's no *obvious* economic incentives to use OP_RETURN, not that there were none.

And this is an important difference. To say that there are none is to say that you know all possible future things that people might use it for. I don't think anyone can know that.

h/t nostr:nprofile1qqsp8julj9f9zszxqw32chzpspd45n090a3sypdrt8lajh9pzuumzvcpg3mhxw309a5hzumxxumx27nedac8xdn6wphxjerswdm8xvnvv96xucnwvdek5ut60f3xjdndd3erxdrs0p4rgmn8xe382uts09jzummwd9hkutcpzamhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcumgvjw

Avatar
Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion 1mo ago

This is one of the reasons why I really like BIP110 (aka BIP444)...!!

It gives you little bit of space to anchor some of the data in op_return (if needed).

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/2017/commits

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.