I agree paying a relay solves the problem of spam for that relay, but that's not necessarely applicable to every service. Some services aren't directly monetizable (not because it's impossible, but because people won't pay for that), and thus another spam prevention mechanism must be used.
Also, many people have PoW keys (you included), so there is clearly demand for these things. My intuition is to use these and/or PoW endorsements for anti-impersonation and spam prevention.
> unless there is a difficulty consensus you are fucked, whoever has the most compute at their disposal can drown your "spam protected" channels.
yes, it can happen, but:
a) that's not going to kill nostr, unlike these shitcoins you mention
b) it's going to cost the attacker a lot of money, and the attack will be public, so people will stop using this spam prevention mechanism and the attacker would have accomplished very little
if it's not monetizable, it's ded
we already see this unfolding in real time
and yes, when there is an economic incentive to spam, the PoW scheme is ded
don't mistake ideals for practical reality
ideals gives you shitcoins and fiat, reality gives you bitcoin
i'm only even responding to this because in your reply and from what i know of you, you are capable of understanding the game theory and economics, otherwise it would be cold silence, i've had this disagreement with several others about PoW and they just did not comprehend what ded means
ded: dedicated aka: deferred enforcement departure
nope, it means finished, over, done, no more use, life over, end
i need a new browser & fuck Websters
i'm back to plain degoogled chromium... firefox has DRM, brave is riddled with complications for dev work
t-y m changing in process, just need a few more completions
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed