If you want to be the most generous person, to everyone, unconditionally, does that mean that accumulating as many #Bitcoin as possible, and then throwing away the keys would be the best way to make a gift to any future human simultaneously?
#asknostr
In a world where everyone uses Bitcoin perhaps yes, until then you'd just be gifting to the existing bitcoiners
Even in a "bitcoinized" world would those who own the most Bitcoin benefit the most from your described scenario. So there is a certain imbalance.
True, the middle way
No. The math behind that suggestion ignores 3 things -
1. The compound effect of revenue accumulated by doing good things, if possible
2. The compound effect of revenue generated by doing bad things, if it's not possible to generate it by doing good
3. That everything happening with money is in the movement of it, not a scoreboard of where it sits
For context, I suck at math, but I try to look like I understand it to impress Digit, so I thought this through
So is your own ego trying to impress yourself?
Digit is Digit. She's obscenely good at math. I'm some guy who's obsessed with her. I never managed to learn much math but I've tried to use it as much as I can ever since meeting her because she's really hot. Not sure if this answers your question
Ah, my thought was that you seperaten yourself from your mind or ego and the self, so thus you are talking in third person
No.
It's nonsense.
