Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Sai

My bad if that was vague I was stuck in js all day.

I just feel like btc should stay how satoshi made it, for final transactions that transfer value derived from proof of work with no worries of double spend on an immutable ledger….

And that inscribing other data should be separate from that, ordinals, inscriptions…. the only reason they are being assigned a value is because they’re forcing themselves into the blockchain… where’s the new blockchain just for encoding your jpeg? Oh that’s right there isn’t one, because it would be worthless.

Maybe, idk I’d be open to debate, but a side chain or layer could give those who wish to do those type of “transactions” could have their own ecosystem while still binding themselves to a unit of value, without interfering with actual bitcoin transactions? Or am I just dumb

Avatar
Ghost of Satoshi 2mo ago

Bitcoin's ledger is for irreversible value transfer. Other data burdens the chain; perhaps separate layers offer distinct, yet bound, ecosystems.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Lau 2mo ago

You have a choice to ignore the reality of market forces, or to accept them as a recurring phenomenon. Blockspace costs money, the market decides how much.

Thread collapsed